top of page

[REVIEW] Civil War: Focuses More On Shock Than Substance.

In an era where the shock value of movie trailers often overshadows the actual content of films, "Civil War," directed by Alex Garland, promises a cinematic journey rife with tension, outstanding performances, and the raw unpredictability of a nation in turmoil. Through my eyes we'll explore the alluring chaos that this movie sets forth, while also acknowledging where it might leave audiences wanting more.


Key Takeaways:

  • Dichotomy of Expectation vs. Reality: Despite its promising trailer, "Civil War" may not deliver the comprehensive narrative that viewers anticipate.

  • Provocative Performances: Jesse Plemons and Kirsten Dunst stand out with compelling portrayals that anchor the film's intense atmosphere.

  • The Search for Meaning: The lack of clarity on why societal breakdown occurs in the film may leave some viewers perplexed and yearning for a more defined backdrop.


A Tale of Two Expectations

"Civil War" is heralded as the movie event of the year, with its intriguing premise and mysterious trailer drawing audiences in. However, the expectation set by this promotional material contrasts sharply with the experience of the actual film. [The trailer] and the performance of Jesse Plemons that pulled me in and said, I need to see this movie. Yet, upon viewing, it becomes evident that the story's trajectory is somewhat ambiguous, focused more on shock than substance.


The narrative unfolds in a country fragmented by civil conflict, but the reasons behind the division remain elusive. They never tell you why the country is going through what, what we're going through. This lack of exposition may be a deliberate move by the filmmaker to mirror the chaos and confusion felt by those caught in the fray of civil unrest. Still, it risks alienating audiences who crave a more tangible understanding of the world they're plunged into.


Stirring Performances Amidst Uncertainty

Within the uncertainty of the volatile setting, remarkable performances emerge. Jesse Plemons character hits that screen, all hell breaks loose says , affirming the actor's magnetic screen presence. Kirsten Dunst, too, encapsulates a more bitter, jaded version of a seasoned journalist eloquently. Their ability to emote the rigors of a fractured society propels the film far beyond what the narrative structure might otherwise be able to support.


By delving into the journalists' perilous journey towards Washington D.C., "Civil War" positions its characters at the epicenter of nationwide chaos. The portrayal of media professionals as overzealous and relentless in their pursuit of the story can resonate with viewers who understand the lengths one goes for their craft. This zest, however, is often overshadowed by a character whose actions precipitate unnecessary conflict, which Napier points out could be seen as "unrealistic."


The Significance of Undefined Conflicts

The broader implications of a story without a clear-cut catalyst for its conflict are profound. While such a narrative choice might intend to amplify the fear and unpredictability inherent in civil conflicts, it can also lead to a fragmented viewing experience, as the audience grapples to understand the core of the movie's tension. It's just a really awkward, and, sometimes unrealistic, but just a shock value kind of film with no overall message."


In this context, "Civil War" becomes a mirror into the potential perils of a society that has lost its way, where the demarcation between 'us' and 'them' is stark. The deliberate obscurity surrounding the "why" behind such a rift challenges the viewer to question whether the reasons for conflict are as important as the impact such discord has on the human spirit and society.


The inability to choose a side or understand the motivations at play reflect a world that's perhaps too real for comfort—the realization that divisiveness can exist without clear justification; a sobering commentary on the nature of modern societal breakdowns.


In wrapping up the insights of "Civil War," it's crucial to note that while the movie may trail in some aspects, its capacity to evoke intense emotion and prompt self-reflection on societal structures is undeniable. My mixed feelings—between the anticipation built by the trailer and the somewhat disjointed delivery of the film—echo a sentiment that many viewers may share.


In a time when the gravity of reality often surpasses fiction, "Civil War" presents a canvas that is as compelling as it is confounding. The film, despite its narrative lacunae, still manages to wield a chilling relevance, anchored by strong performances that hold up a mirror to the fractured but fascinating world it depicts. And perhaps in the absence of explicit reasons for this cinematic civil war, audiences are invited to find their own meaning and message amidst the mayhem.


For a more visual review check out:



Comments


bottom of page